2013/02/22
リスク対策ドットコム英語版>記事
the 2010 eruption of Eyjafjallajokull, the most recent eruption to affect the UK, was small. However it caused the biggest disruption to European air travel since WW2 as the position of the eruption was such that it ejected ash into the Jet stream. For 5 days air travel over most of Europe was halted, affecting over 100,000 travelers some of whom resorted to twitter to ask for temporary accommodation and assistance.
The Airline industry was the most severely affected, as with all airspace closed re-booking or rerouting flights was not an option. Hotels and Tourist areas were also impacted as were industries that depended on airfreight. An aviation business continuity expert has kindly shared his views on best practice gained from the experience of 2010. 1. Government Agencies need to have available Ash Cloud Forecasting and Monitoring Equipments. The aircraft which usually fly over UK to measure the density and distribution of ash at various levels of altitude, was unfortunately parked in a hanger for maintenance. 2. The national air traffic service should have a BC plan in place to deal with loss of airspace availability for any reason. All affected parties should work together on a national plan. The National Air Traffic Service (NATS) had declared the flow rates in various ATC (Air Traffic Control) sectors throughout UK that it could provide service to. The airlines agreed on a pro rata these flow rates among themselves based on their normal level of traffic and thus make their own decisions about which flights to operate or cancel. 3. Priority should be given to flights which have few alternatives, over those where alternatives do exist. e.g. where good road and rail networks exist, domestic flights should be cancelled in order to allow long-haul overseas flights to operate where capacity is severely reduced. However for this to work, it will be necessary to arrange for extra coach and train services to be laid on to cope with the additional passengers and likewise extra road haulage for essential cargo. 4. Government meteorologists and airline flight planners should be working together. Enabling airline planners to understand the most likely spread of ash cloud at various levels and consider alternative routings for flights to avoid the ash or fly at sub optimal flight levels (from a fuel efficiency point of view). Where the rerouting is significant and beyond an aircraft's range, the airlines should consider en route stops for fuel uplift. This may result in crew flight time limitation issues, the need for additional catering uplift etc and arrangements will need to be in hand (eg handling agreements where such calls are at airports not normally used by the airline). 5. The Government should not seek to set airline priorities, just inform airlines of which airspace is considered safe. There will likely be issues raised about such things as should business traffic get priority over leisure traffic. These are pointless and agreement will not be reached. If the Government makes such a decision it will render itself liable to claims for compensation by the aggrieved parties. Wholly leisure airlines would be threatened with bankruptcy etc. Priority should be given to flights which have few alternatives, over those where alternatives do exist. 6. Finally, even the best business continuity planning will not enable normal operations in circumstance with wide spread impact. There will be mass disruption in the form of delays and cancellations and the planning must include how such widespread disruption will be managed.●This article was translated into Japanese and published on magazine "Risk-taisaku.com"
vol.35.
◆Profile Samantha Ueno, TIEMS Social Media Manager. Presently studying MPhil Technology Policy at University of Cambridge (Judges Business School). Voluntarily run the Social Media communication strategy of The International Emergency Management Society (www.TIEMS.info). "Samantha's BCP English" has been serialized in the Risk-taisaku.com magazine. Her current interests is on Technology and Organisational Reliance.
リスク対策ドットコム英語版>記事の他の記事
- An ‘App’ for everything; But can Apps for Disaster save lives?
- Once upon a time in Fukushima
- UK experience of the Impact of Volcanic Eruptions
- BS25999 Certification Is No Guarantee of a Robust, Fit-for-purpose Business Continuity Capability
- A need to re-think the trade-off between continuity and productivity
おすすめ記事
-
令和8年熊本地震 猛暑の被災地で熱中症を避ける
最大震度7を記録した令和8年熊本地震。熊本県内では400超の避難所が開設され、約9千人が避難している(29日時点)。真夏の避難生活は、熱中症の危険性を確実に高める。しかもこれからは、猛暑・酷暑下での復旧活動が本格化し、多くの人々が被災地で活動する。現地で熱中症をどう防いだらいいか。熱中症と災害医療に詳しい、さいたま赤十字病院高度救命救急センターの席 望医師に対策を聞いた。
2026/07/30
-
令和8年熊本地震 広がるデマ、どう見分ける?SNSとの向き合い方
28日に発生した最大震度7を記録した熊本地震では、早くも豪華寝台列車「ななつ星」が脱線したなどのデマ情報が広く拡散された。災害のたびに、広くSNSで拡散される情報にどう向き合えばいいか。デジタル空間の情報分析を専門とする Japan Nexus Intelligence の竜口七彩氏に聞いた。
2026/07/29
-
中澤・木村が斬る!今週のニュース解説
毎週火曜日(平日のみ)朝9時~、リスク対策.com編集長 中澤幸介と兵庫県立大学教授 木村玲欧氏(心理学・危機管理学)が今週注目のニュースを短く、わかりやすく解説します。
2026/07/28
-
-
事例研究で有事に備え、組織の体質改善で形骸化を防ぐ
組織レジリエンスの強化やサイバーセキュリティーの向上、サプライチェーンの強靭化など、危機管理やリスク管理担当者が関与する領域は年々拡大している。変化する社会状況にあわせ、担当者はどのように学び、備え、対応することが求められるのか。森総合研究所代表の森健さんは、自治体と企業で危機管理担当者としての経験を積み、現在はコンサルタントとして、企業や団体の危機管理の支援を手がけている。自身の経験を踏まえ、危機管理の担当者にどうアドバイスしているのか、話を聞いた。
2026/07/27
-
-
-
-
-









※スパム投稿防止のためコメントは編集部の承認制となっておりますが、いただいたコメントは原則、すべて掲載いたします。
※個人情報は入力しないようご注意ください。
» パスワードをお忘れの方