2013/02/22
リスク対策ドットコム英語版>記事
the 2010 eruption of Eyjafjallajokull, the most recent eruption to affect the UK, was small. However it caused the biggest disruption to European air travel since WW2 as the position of the eruption was such that it ejected ash into the Jet stream. For 5 days air travel over most of Europe was halted, affecting over 100,000 travelers some of whom resorted to twitter to ask for temporary accommodation and assistance.
The Airline industry was the most severely affected, as with all airspace closed re-booking or rerouting flights was not an option. Hotels and Tourist areas were also impacted as were industries that depended on airfreight. An aviation business continuity expert has kindly shared his views on best practice gained from the experience of 2010. 1. Government Agencies need to have available Ash Cloud Forecasting and Monitoring Equipments. The aircraft which usually fly over UK to measure the density and distribution of ash at various levels of altitude, was unfortunately parked in a hanger for maintenance. 2. The national air traffic service should have a BC plan in place to deal with loss of airspace availability for any reason. All affected parties should work together on a national plan. The National Air Traffic Service (NATS) had declared the flow rates in various ATC (Air Traffic Control) sectors throughout UK that it could provide service to. The airlines agreed on a pro rata these flow rates among themselves based on their normal level of traffic and thus make their own decisions about which flights to operate or cancel. 3. Priority should be given to flights which have few alternatives, over those where alternatives do exist. e.g. where good road and rail networks exist, domestic flights should be cancelled in order to allow long-haul overseas flights to operate where capacity is severely reduced. However for this to work, it will be necessary to arrange for extra coach and train services to be laid on to cope with the additional passengers and likewise extra road haulage for essential cargo. 4. Government meteorologists and airline flight planners should be working together. Enabling airline planners to understand the most likely spread of ash cloud at various levels and consider alternative routings for flights to avoid the ash or fly at sub optimal flight levels (from a fuel efficiency point of view). Where the rerouting is significant and beyond an aircraft's range, the airlines should consider en route stops for fuel uplift. This may result in crew flight time limitation issues, the need for additional catering uplift etc and arrangements will need to be in hand (eg handling agreements where such calls are at airports not normally used by the airline). 5. The Government should not seek to set airline priorities, just inform airlines of which airspace is considered safe. There will likely be issues raised about such things as should business traffic get priority over leisure traffic. These are pointless and agreement will not be reached. If the Government makes such a decision it will render itself liable to claims for compensation by the aggrieved parties. Wholly leisure airlines would be threatened with bankruptcy etc. Priority should be given to flights which have few alternatives, over those where alternatives do exist. 6. Finally, even the best business continuity planning will not enable normal operations in circumstance with wide spread impact. There will be mass disruption in the form of delays and cancellations and the planning must include how such widespread disruption will be managed.●This article was translated into Japanese and published on magazine "Risk-taisaku.com"
vol.35.
◆Profile Samantha Ueno, TIEMS Social Media Manager. Presently studying MPhil Technology Policy at University of Cambridge (Judges Business School). Voluntarily run the Social Media communication strategy of The International Emergency Management Society (www.TIEMS.info). "Samantha's BCP English" has been serialized in the Risk-taisaku.com magazine. Her current interests is on Technology and Organisational Reliance.
リスク対策ドットコム英語版>記事の他の記事
- An ‘App’ for everything; But can Apps for Disaster save lives?
- Once upon a time in Fukushima
- UK experience of the Impact of Volcanic Eruptions
- BS25999 Certification Is No Guarantee of a Robust, Fit-for-purpose Business Continuity Capability
- A need to re-think the trade-off between continuity and productivity
おすすめ記事
-
中澤・木村が斬る!今週のニュース解説
毎週火曜日(平日のみ)朝9時~、リスク対策.com編集長 中澤幸介と兵庫県立大学教授 木村玲欧氏(心理学・危機管理学)が今週注目のニュースを短く、わかりやすく解説します。
2026/07/21
-
-
-
-
-
AIによるメール監査で悪意なき不正リスクを事前に検知
昨今、企業の不祥事が多発している。不正会計や金銭の着服、独占禁止法で禁止される談合やカルテルなどが発覚することで企業の信用が失墜し、業績悪化にいたるケースが多い。企業の不正を防ぐ方法で有効なのが、社内のメールモニタリング(メール監査)だ。国際訴訟・不正調査のパイオニアであるFRONTEO(東京都港区)は、リーガルテック分野で培ったノウハウから自社開発したAIエンジン「KIBIT(キビット)」をコア技術に、メール監査で企業の不正リスクを検知するサービスを提供する。膨大な量の電子データから、どのように不正を発見し、未然に防ぐのか。代表取締役社長の守本正宏氏に話を聞いた。
2026/07/13
-
-
困難な工場のサイバーセキュリティ強化机上訓練で隠れていた現場力を発掘(参天製薬)
製造業にとって最も避けたい、売上に直結するサイバー攻撃による工場の稼働停止。しかし、セキュリティ対策の導入は工場ならではの困難があり、簡単にはいかない。参天製薬(大阪市北区、伊藤 毅代表取締役社長)は、サプライアーのランサムウェア感染をきっかけに、2017年から国内外の工場のサイバーセキュリティ対策を強化。工場との対話を重ね、着実に進めている。
2026/07/10
-
リスク対策.PROライト会員用ダウンロードページ
リスク対策.PROライト会員はこちらのページから最新号をダウンロードできます。
2026/07/05
-
「情シス任せ」「コンサル任せ」では終わる
社会機能の維持に欠かせない業種でサイバーインシデントが相次いでいます。事業停止の影響は一企業のビジネスの域を超えサプライチェーン全体に波及。いまやセキュリティは経営の重要課題です。企業を取り巻くサイバーリスクと求められる対策について、日立ソリューションズの扇健一氏と辻󠄀敦司氏に聞きました。
2026/07/03








※スパム投稿防止のためコメントは編集部の承認制となっておりますが、いただいたコメントは原則、すべて掲載いたします。
※個人情報は入力しないようご注意ください。
» パスワードをお忘れの方