2013/02/22
リスク対策ドットコム英語版>記事
the 2010 eruption of Eyjafjallajokull, the most recent eruption to affect the UK, was small. However it caused the biggest disruption to European air travel since WW2 as the position of the eruption was such that it ejected ash into the Jet stream. For 5 days air travel over most of Europe was halted, affecting over 100,000 travelers some of whom resorted to twitter to ask for temporary accommodation and assistance.
The Airline industry was the most severely affected, as with all airspace closed re-booking or rerouting flights was not an option. Hotels and Tourist areas were also impacted as were industries that depended on airfreight. An aviation business continuity expert has kindly shared his views on best practice gained from the experience of 2010. 1. Government Agencies need to have available Ash Cloud Forecasting and Monitoring Equipments. The aircraft which usually fly over UK to measure the density and distribution of ash at various levels of altitude, was unfortunately parked in a hanger for maintenance. 2. The national air traffic service should have a BC plan in place to deal with loss of airspace availability for any reason. All affected parties should work together on a national plan. The National Air Traffic Service (NATS) had declared the flow rates in various ATC (Air Traffic Control) sectors throughout UK that it could provide service to. The airlines agreed on a pro rata these flow rates among themselves based on their normal level of traffic and thus make their own decisions about which flights to operate or cancel. 3. Priority should be given to flights which have few alternatives, over those where alternatives do exist. e.g. where good road and rail networks exist, domestic flights should be cancelled in order to allow long-haul overseas flights to operate where capacity is severely reduced. However for this to work, it will be necessary to arrange for extra coach and train services to be laid on to cope with the additional passengers and likewise extra road haulage for essential cargo. 4. Government meteorologists and airline flight planners should be working together. Enabling airline planners to understand the most likely spread of ash cloud at various levels and consider alternative routings for flights to avoid the ash or fly at sub optimal flight levels (from a fuel efficiency point of view). Where the rerouting is significant and beyond an aircraft's range, the airlines should consider en route stops for fuel uplift. This may result in crew flight time limitation issues, the need for additional catering uplift etc and arrangements will need to be in hand (eg handling agreements where such calls are at airports not normally used by the airline). 5. The Government should not seek to set airline priorities, just inform airlines of which airspace is considered safe. There will likely be issues raised about such things as should business traffic get priority over leisure traffic. These are pointless and agreement will not be reached. If the Government makes such a decision it will render itself liable to claims for compensation by the aggrieved parties. Wholly leisure airlines would be threatened with bankruptcy etc. Priority should be given to flights which have few alternatives, over those where alternatives do exist. 6. Finally, even the best business continuity planning will not enable normal operations in circumstance with wide spread impact. There will be mass disruption in the form of delays and cancellations and the planning must include how such widespread disruption will be managed.●This article was translated into Japanese and published on magazine "Risk-taisaku.com"
vol.35.
◆Profile Samantha Ueno, TIEMS Social Media Manager. Presently studying MPhil Technology Policy at University of Cambridge (Judges Business School). Voluntarily run the Social Media communication strategy of The International Emergency Management Society (www.TIEMS.info). "Samantha's BCP English" has been serialized in the Risk-taisaku.com magazine. Her current interests is on Technology and Organisational Reliance.
リスク対策ドットコム英語版>記事の他の記事
- An ‘App’ for everything; But can Apps for Disaster save lives?
- Once upon a time in Fukushima
- UK experience of the Impact of Volcanic Eruptions
- BS25999 Certification Is No Guarantee of a Robust, Fit-for-purpose Business Continuity Capability
- A need to re-think the trade-off between continuity and productivity
おすすめ記事
-
中澤・木村が斬る!今週のニュース解説
毎週火曜日(平日のみ)朝9時~、リスク対策.com編集長 中澤幸介と兵庫県立大学教授 木村玲欧氏(心理学・危機管理学)が今週注目のニュースを短く、わかりやすく解説します。
2025/09/02
-
-
-
ゲリラ雷雨の捕捉率9割 民間気象会社の実力
突発的・局地的な大雨、いわゆる「ゲリラ雷雨」は今シーズン、全国で約7万8000 回発生、8月中旬がピーク。民間気象会社のウェザーニューズが7月に発表した中期予想です。同社予報センターは今年も、専任チームを編成してゲリラ雷雨をリアルタイムに観測中。予測精度はいまどこまで来ているのかを聞きました。
2025/08/24
-
スギヨ、顧客の信頼を重視し代替生産せず
2024年1月に発生した能登半島地震により、大きな被害を受けた水産練製品メーカーの株式会社スギヨ(本社:石川県七尾市)。その再建を支えたのは、同社の商品を心から愛する消費者の存在だった。全国に複数の工場があり、多くの商品について代替生産に踏み切る一方、主力商品の1つ「ビタミンちくわ」に関しては「能登で生産している」という顧客の期待を重視し、あえて現地工場の再開を待つという異例の判断を下した。結果として、消費者からの強い支持を受け、ビタミンちくわは過去最高近い売り上げを記録している。一方、BCPでは大規模な地震などが想定されていないなどの課題も明らかになった。同社では今、BCPの立て直しを進めている。
2025/08/24
-
-
-
-
ゲリラ豪雨を30分前に捕捉 万博会場で実証実験
「ゲリラ豪雨」は不確実性の高い気象現象の代表格。これを正確に捕捉しようという試みが現在、大阪・関西万博の会場で行われています。情報通信研究機構(NICT)、理化学研究所、大阪大学、防災科学技術研究所、Preferred Networks、エムティーアイの6者連携による実証実験。予測システムの仕組みと開発の経緯、実証実験の概要を聞きました。
2025/08/20
-
※スパム投稿防止のためコメントは編集部の承認制となっておりますが、いただいたコメントは原則、すべて掲載いたします。
※個人情報は入力しないようご注意ください。
» パスワードをお忘れの方